Best Practices In Government To Government Consultation

Dec 22, 2025 | Tribal Government

When federal agencies consider policies that affect American Indian tribes, government consultation serves as the foundational process for honoring the nation-to-nation relationship between tribal nations and the United States. Patterson Real Bird & Rasmussen LLP, a firm dedicated to representing American Indian tribes and tribal entities across the United States, provides knowledgeable guidance on these critical matters.

Tribal leaders and federal officials seeking to understand consultation requirements may reach the firm at the Colorado Office (303) 926-5292, Southwest Office (505) 395-4500, Great Plains Office (701) 854-7619, or DC Office (202) 434-8903. As federal agencies continue to strengthen their consultation practices in 2026, understanding how these processes protect tribal sovereignty remains essential for all parties involved.

What Are the Best Practices in Government to Government Consultation?

Best practices in government to government consultation require federal agencies to engage in meaningful, two-way dialogue with tribal officials before making decisions that affect tribal communities. Federal guidance, including materials issued by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, emphasizes early notice, participation by senior agency officials, and opportunities for tribal input to meaningfully influence final decisions. The 2022 Presidential Memorandum on Uniform Standards for Tribal Consultation reinforces these requirements as baseline standards across all federal agencies.

Summary of Government to Government Consultation

Government to government consultation defines how federal agencies engage with American Indian tribes when proposed actions may affect tribal interests. These consultation obligations arise from tribal sovereignty, the federal trust responsibility, and long-standing constitutional, statutory, and treaty frameworks. Meaningful consultation generally involves advance notice, two-way dialogue, participation by federal decision-makers, and documentation reflecting how tribal input was considered. Recent federal policies, including uniform consultation standards adopted in 2022, seek to promote greater consistency and accountability across agencies. Patterson Real Bird & Rasmussen LLP works with tribes, tribal entities, and individuals nationwide on matters involving federal-tribal relations, consultation obligations, and policy engagement.

The Legal Foundation of Federal-Tribal Consultation

The United States maintains a unique legal and political relationship with American Indian tribes, one rooted in the Constitution, treaties, statutes, and judicial decisions spanning more than two centuries. This relationship recognizes tribes as sovereign nations with inherent powers of self-governance. The Bureau of Indian Affairs emphasizes that tribes have a government to government relationship with the federal government, grounded in their retained inherent sovereignty rather than in racial or ethnic status.

Executive Order 13175, issued in November 2000, established the primary framework for federal consultation with tribal governments. This executive order directs all federal agencies to engage in regular and meaningful consultation with tribal officials when developing policies that have tribal implications. The order acknowledges that Indian tribes exercise inherent sovereign powers over their members and territory, and federal agencies must respect this authority when formulating regulations or legislative proposals.

Core Elements of Meaningful Consultation

Meaningful consultation differs significantly from mere notification or public comment periods. According to the General Services Administration, formal consultation includes several defining characteristics:

  • Two-way dialogue between official representatives of tribes and federal agencies is conducted on a nation-to-nation basis
  • Early and timely notice to tribes with sufficient detail to allow for informed participation
  • Participation by appropriate federal officials with decision-making authority
  • Discussion with a preference for in-person meetings when feasible
  • Documentation of the consultation process through notes or other records
  • Federal response explaining how tribal input was incorporated into final decisions

The 2022 Presidential Memorandum on Uniform Standards for Tribal Consultation further strengthened these requirements by establishing baseline standards that all federal agencies must implement. These standards emphasize that consultation recognizes tribal sovereignty and the nation-to-nation relationship, and requires that information obtained from tribes be given meaningful consideration.

Patterson Real Bird & Rasmussen LLP: Serving Tribal Nations Across the United States

Our mission is to provide superior legal services tailored to our clients’ needs while honoring their sovereignty, self-sufficiency, and self-governance. Patterson Real Bird & Rasmussen LLP brings extensive experience representing tribes in federal consultation matters, regulatory proceedings, and policy advocacy. The firm understands that effective consultation protects not only individual tribal interests but also the broader principles of tribal self-determination that benefit all Indian Country.

When Federal Consultation Is Required

Federal agencies must determine early in their policy development process whether consultation with tribal governments is required or appropriate. This analysis should occur regardless of whether a tribal government specifically requests consultation. Policies that have tribal implications include regulations, legislative proposals, and other actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes or on the distribution of power between the federal government and tribal nations.

The federal trust responsibility reflects the United States’ longstanding obligation to protect tribal treaty rights, lands, assets, and resources, and to carry out federal programs in ways that respect tribal self-governance. While the scope of this responsibility depends on specific statutes, treaties, and regulations, it informs how agencies engage with tribal nations.

When agencies fail to consider tribal interests or comply with applicable consultation requirements adequately, tribes may challenge those actions through administrative processes and, in some cases, judicial review under governing federal law.

Strengthening Consultation Through Proper Preparation

Tribes preparing for federal consultation sessions might consider several strategies to maximize the effectiveness of their participation. Documenting concerns in writing before consultation sessions helps ensure that tribal positions are clearly communicated and preserved for the record. Identifying specific treaty provisions, prior agreements, or statutory authorities that support tribal positions strengthens the legal foundation for tribal input.

Tribal officials often find that coordination with other affected tribes through intertribal organizations amplifies their collective voice in federal policy discussions. Requesting written responses from agencies regarding how tribal input was considered helps hold federal officials accountable to their consultation obligations.

Many individuals interested in learning more about tribal sovereignty and federal-tribal relations find online communities and discussion forums helpful for connecting with others who share similar interests and experiences.

Recent Developments in Federal Consultation Policy

The federal government has taken significant steps in recent years to strengthen consultation requirements and improve the quality of federal-tribal engagement. The White House Council on Native American Affairs coordinates consultation efforts across federal agencies and works to identify opportunities for policy reforms that support tribal self-determination. Multiple federal agencies have updated their individual consultation policies to align with the uniform standards established in 2022.

These developments reflect growing recognition that meaningful government consultation must go beyond procedural compliance to achieve genuine collaboration between sovereigns. Tribes seeking to participate effectively in these evolving processes may benefit from engaging seasoned legal counsel who understands both the historical context and the current requirements of federal-tribal consultation.

Consider Visiting With an Experienced Attorney

Navigating federal government consultation requirements and protecting tribal interests in policy proceedings requires careful attention to legal obligations, procedural requirements, and strategic considerations. Patterson Real Bird & Rasmussen LLP stands ready to assist tribes, tribal entities, and individual Indians with matters involving federal-tribal relationships and government to government consultation. Tribal leaders facing consultation challenges or seeking to strengthen their engagement with federal agencies may reach the firm at Colorado Office (303) 926-5292, Southwest Office (505) 395-4500, Great Plains Office (701) 854-7619, or DC Office (202) 434-8903 to discuss their specific circumstances.

Important Frequently Asked Questions About Government Consultation

Listed below are several FAQs about government to government consultation, specific to Native American tribes. 

What Is Government to Government Consultation?

Government to government consultation is a formal process through which federal agencies engage directly with tribal governments when proposed actions may affect tribal interests. It reflects the nation-to-nation relationship between tribes and the United States and recognizes tribes as sovereign governments.

When Are Federal Agencies Required to Consult With Tribes?

Consultation is required when a federal action has tribal implications, including regulations, legislative proposals, or policies with substantial direct effects on tribes. Agencies are expected to assess the need for consultation early in the decision-making process.

How Is Consultation Different From Public Comment?

Consultation involves direct, two-way dialogue between tribal officials and federal decision-makers. Unlike public comment, consultation is conducted on a government to government basis and requires agencies to consider and respond to tribal input.

What Role Does Tribal Sovereignty Play in Consultation?

Tribal sovereignty underpins consultation obligations by recognizing tribes as self-governing nations. Consultation respects tribes’ inherent authority over their members, lands, and internal affairs.

What Are the Core Elements of Meaningful Consultation?

Meaningful consultation typically includes advance notice, participation by authorized decision-makers, opportunities for in-person discussion when feasible, and a documented record. Agencies are also expected to explain how tribal input influenced final outcomes.

Can Tribes Challenge Federal Actions Taken Without Adequate Consultation?

In some cases, tribes may challenge agency actions when consultation obligations tied to applicable statutes, treaties, or regulations are not met. These challenges often focus on whether agencies adequately considered tribal interests as required under governing federal law. 

How Can Tribes Prepare for Consultation With Federal Agencies?

Preparation may include documenting concerns in writing, identifying relevant treaties or statutes, and coordinating with other affected tribes. Clear preparation helps ensure tribal positions are preserved and meaningfully considered.

How Can Patterson Real Bird & Rasmussen LLP Assist With Consultation Matters?

Consider visiting with an experienced attorney at Patterson Real Bird & Rasmussen LLP to learn more about consultation obligations and federal-tribal relations. The firm helps tribes, tribal entities, and individual Indians understand consultation processes and potential legal options.

Categories